Cap reached
At 5% with a 10 cap, a 400 pot produces 20 raw rake but only 10 charged.
Apply percentage-capped or fixed rake to a pot, then inspect effective rake, net pot, rakeback, and equal or contribution-based allocations. The poker rake calculator explains mathematical cost without recommending or comparing any operator.
Equal covers all dealt players; average contributed splits equally among contributors; weighted contributed is proportional to contribution.
How the result is built
Percentage rake rises linearly until the cap. After the cap, charged rake stays flat while its effective percentage of larger pots falls.
| Pot | Raw rake | Charged rake | Effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 5% |
| 100 | 5 | 5 | 5% |
| 150 | 7.5 | 7.5 | 5% |
| 200 | 10 | 10 | 5% |
| 250 | 12.5 | 10 | 4% |
| 300 | 15 | 10 | 3.33% |
| 350 | 17.5 | 10 | 2.86% |
| 400 | 20 | 10 | 2.5% |
rake = min(pot × rate, cap)
Before the cap, rake rises with the pot. Once capped, the amount stays fixed and its effective percentage falls as the pot grows.
Rake after rakeback multiplies charged rake by one minus the entered return rate. It does not alter how the original pot was awarded.
Equal allocation divides by dealt players. Contributed methods need each player’s contribution and should not be inferred when those inputs are absent.
Hold pot size, player count, street reached, currency, and cashback treatment constant when comparing two schedules. A lower headline percentage can still cost more when its maximum charge or no-flop-no-drop rule differs. The amount left after the fee is the clearest common result to verify.
At 5% with a 10 cap, a 400 pot produces 20 raw rake but only 10 charged.
When the policy applies and no flop is seen, charged rake is zero regardless of the nominal rate.
Charged rake divided by pot size.
No. The implementation caps fixed and percentage costs at the pot.
No. It is applied after charged rake is capped.
No. You supply the cost terms yourself.